6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Wengang Wang wen.gang.wang@oracle.com
commit 58f880711f2ba53fd5e959875aff5b3bf6d5c32e upstream.
A user with a completely full filesystem experienced an unexpected shutdown when the filesystem tried to write the superblock during runtime. kernel shows the following dmesg:
[ 8.176281] XFS (dm-4): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_sb_write_verify+0x60/0x120 [xfs], xfs_sb block 0x0 [ 8.177417] XFS (dm-4): Unmount and run xfs_repair [ 8.178016] XFS (dm-4): First 128 bytes of corrupted metadata buffer: [ 8.178703] 00000000: 58 46 53 42 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 01 90 00 00 XFSB............ [ 8.179487] 00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ [ 8.180312] 00000020: cf 12 dc 89 ca 26 45 29 92 e6 e3 8d 3b b8 a2 c3 .....&E)....;... [ 8.181150] 00000030: 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 ................ [ 8.182003] 00000040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 81 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 82 ................ [ 8.182004] 00000050: 00 00 00 01 00 64 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 00 .....d.......... [ 8.182004] 00000060: 00 00 64 00 b4 a5 02 00 02 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 ..d............. [ 8.182005] 00000070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 09 09 03 17 00 00 19 ................ [ 8.182008] XFS (dm-4): Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down filesystem [ 8.182010] XFS (dm-4): Please unmount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s)
When xfs_log_sb writes super block to disk, b_fdblocks is fetched from m_fdblocks without any lock. As m_fdblocks can experience a positive -> negative -> positive changing when the FS reaches fullness (see xfs_mod_fdblocks). So there is a chance that sb_fdblocks is negative, and because sb_fdblocks is type of unsigned long long, it reads super big. And sb_fdblocks being bigger than sb_dblocks is a problem during log recovery, xfs_validate_sb_write() complains.
Fix: As sb_fdblocks will be re-calculated during mount when lazysbcount is enabled, We just need to make xfs_validate_sb_write() happy -- make sure sb_fdblocks is not nenative. This patch also takes care of other percpu counters in xfs_log_sb.
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang wen.gang.wang@oracle.com Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong djwong@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R chandanbabu@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Catherine Hoang catherine.hoang@oracle.com Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong djwong@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c @@ -1031,11 +1031,12 @@ xfs_log_sb( * and hence we don't need have to update it here. */ if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp)) { - mp->m_sb.sb_icount = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_icount); + mp->m_sb.sb_icount = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&mp->m_icount); mp->m_sb.sb_ifree = min_t(uint64_t, - percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_ifree), + percpu_counter_sum_positive(&mp->m_ifree), mp->m_sb.sb_icount); - mp->m_sb.sb_fdblocks = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_fdblocks); + mp->m_sb.sb_fdblocks = + percpu_counter_sum_positive(&mp->m_fdblocks); }
xfs_sb_to_disk(bp->b_addr, &mp->m_sb);