On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:46:54 -0400 Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:53:28PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:23:38 -0400 Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
From: Jonathan Bakker xc-racer2@live.ca
[ Upstream commit 882bf52fdeab47dbe991cc0e564b0b51c571d0a3 ]
S5PV210's ADC variant is almost the same as v1 except that it has 10 channels and doesn't require the pmu register
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker xc-racer2@live.ca Signed-off-by: Paweł Chmiel pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org
I have no particular objection to adding new IDs (which is more or less what this patch is), but I didn't know autosel was picking them up. So a bit of surprise... If intentional then fine to apply to stable.
I dragged it in because 103cda6a3b8d2 ("iio: adc: exynos-adc: Use proper number of channels for Exynos4x12") which is tagged for stable depended on this patch, and given it just adds new IDs which is part of what we take for stable I just took it in as is.
Ah fair enough! Thanks for the explanation.
Jonathan
-- Thanks, Sasha