From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 65a691f5f8f0bb63d6a82eec7b0ffd193d8d8a5f ]
The reason for clearing boot_ec_is_ecdt in acpi_ec_add() (if a PNP0C09 device object matching the ECDT boot EC had been found in the namespace) was to cause acpi_ec_ecdt_start() to return early, but since the latter does not look at boot_ec_is_ecdt any more, acpi_ec_add() need not clear it.
Moreover, doing that may be confusing as it may cause "DSDT" to be printed instead of "ECDT" in the EC initialization completion message, so stop doing it.
While at it, split the EC initialization completion message into two messages, one regarding the boot EC and another one printed regardless of whether or not the EC at hand is the boot one.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/acpi/ec.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c index ca5cdb621c2a7..2dba4e7a83b76 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c @@ -1573,7 +1573,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_add(struct acpi_device *device)
if (boot_ec && ec->command_addr == boot_ec->command_addr && ec->data_addr == boot_ec->data_addr) { - boot_ec_is_ecdt = false; /* * Trust PNP0C09 namespace location rather than * ECDT ID. But trust ECDT GPE rather than _GPE @@ -1593,9 +1592,12 @@ static int acpi_ec_add(struct acpi_device *device)
if (ec == boot_ec) acpi_handle_info(boot_ec->handle, - "Boot %s EC used to handle transactions and events\n", + "Boot %s EC initialization complete\n", boot_ec_is_ecdt ? "ECDT" : "DSDT");
+ acpi_handle_info(ec->handle, + "EC: Used to handle transactions and events\n"); + device->driver_data = ec;
ret = !!request_region(ec->data_addr, 1, "EC data");