5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ilya Dryomov idryomov@gmail.com
commit ded080c86b3f99683774af0441a58fc2e3d60cae upstream.
The running list is supposed to contain requests that are pinning the exclusive lock, i.e. those that must be flushed before exclusive lock is released. When wake_lock_waiters() is called to handle an error, requests on the acquiring list are failed with that error and no flushing takes place. Briefly moving them to the running list is not only pointless but also harmful: if exclusive lock gets acquired before all of their state machines are scheduled and go through rbd_lock_del_request(), we trigger
rbd_assert(list_empty(&rbd_dev->running_list));
in rbd_try_acquire_lock().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 637cd060537d ("rbd: new exclusive lock wait/wake code") Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov idryomov@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/block/rbd.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c @@ -3517,14 +3517,15 @@ static bool rbd_lock_add_request(struct static void rbd_lock_del_request(struct rbd_img_request *img_req) { struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = img_req->rbd_dev; - bool need_wakeup; + bool need_wakeup = false;
lockdep_assert_held(&rbd_dev->lock_rwsem); spin_lock(&rbd_dev->lock_lists_lock); - rbd_assert(!list_empty(&img_req->lock_item)); - list_del_init(&img_req->lock_item); - need_wakeup = (rbd_dev->lock_state == RBD_LOCK_STATE_RELEASING && - list_empty(&rbd_dev->running_list)); + if (!list_empty(&img_req->lock_item)) { + list_del_init(&img_req->lock_item); + need_wakeup = (rbd_dev->lock_state == RBD_LOCK_STATE_RELEASING && + list_empty(&rbd_dev->running_list)); + } spin_unlock(&rbd_dev->lock_lists_lock); if (need_wakeup) complete(&rbd_dev->releasing_wait); @@ -3907,14 +3908,19 @@ static void wake_lock_waiters(struct rbd return; }
- list_for_each_entry(img_req, &rbd_dev->acquiring_list, lock_item) { + while (!list_empty(&rbd_dev->acquiring_list)) { + img_req = list_first_entry(&rbd_dev->acquiring_list, + struct rbd_img_request, lock_item); mutex_lock(&img_req->state_mutex); rbd_assert(img_req->state == RBD_IMG_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK); + if (!result) + list_move_tail(&img_req->lock_item, + &rbd_dev->running_list); + else + list_del_init(&img_req->lock_item); rbd_img_schedule(img_req, result); mutex_unlock(&img_req->state_mutex); } - - list_splice_tail_init(&rbd_dev->acquiring_list, &rbd_dev->running_list); }
static bool locker_equal(const struct ceph_locker *lhs,