Re: [PATCH] irq: Request and release resources for chained IRQs

David Heidelberg david@ixit.cz writes:

is there chance to get this patch included or could be this issue solved with different approach?

Included into what? This patch is incorrect as I pointed out in review here:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.1812071143480.14498@nanos.tec.l...

So why are you even asking?

I recommended to switch this away from chained handler and then the whole story ended with this mail:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.1812071404140.14498@nanos.tec.l...

I have no idea how the GPIO people solved that problem, but certainly not by applying this.

Thanks,

tglx