From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com
KVM doesn't follow the SMCCC when it comes to unimplemented calls, and inject an UNDEF instead of returning an error. Since firmware calls are now used for security mitigation, they are becoming more common, and the undef is counter productive.
Instead, let's follow the SMCCC which states that -1 must be returned to the caller when getting an unknown function number.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org --- arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c index 304203fa9e33..e60494f1eef9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
ret = kvm_psci_call(vcpu); if (ret < 0) { - kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu); + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); return 1; }
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) { - kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu); + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); return 1; }