On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:30:44AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 14:43 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
From: Dave Chinner dchinner@redhat.com
commit a9a238e83fbb0df31c3b9b67003f8f9d1d1b6c96 upstream.
This reverts commit 172b06c32b9497 ("mm: slowly shrink slabs with a relatively small number of objects").
This revert will result in the slab caches of dead cgroups with a small number of remaining objects never getting reclaimed, which can be a memory leak in some configurations.
What's the "right" choice though? we get either leaky cgroups or hanging xfs.
But hey, that's your tradeoff to make.
I don't think that any decision was made here, the stable tree simply follows upstream with regards to fixes and bugs such as these: we remain "bug compatible" with upstream in these scenarios, there was no decision made to prefer either bug.
-- Thanks, Sasha