5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Zeng Heng zengheng4@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit bd65694223f7ad11c790ab63ad1af87a771192ee ]
The return value of scsi_device_reprobe() is currently ignored in _scsih_reprobe_lun(). Fixing the calling code to deal with the potential error is non-trivial, so for now just WARN_ON().
The handling of scsi_device_reprobe()'s return value refers to _scsih_reprobe_lun() and the following link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/094fdbf57487af4f395238c0525b2a560c8f68f0.1469766...
Fixes: f99be43b3024 ("[SCSI] fusion: power pc and miscellaneous bug fixs") Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng zengheng4@huawei.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241024084417.154655-1-zengheng4@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.petersen@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c index 18b91ea1a353f..e56e96671da99 100644 --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c @@ -4205,10 +4205,8 @@ mptsas_find_phyinfo_by_phys_disk_num(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc, u8 phys_disk_num, static void mptsas_reprobe_lun(struct scsi_device *sdev, void *data) { - int rc; - sdev->no_uld_attach = data ? 1 : 0; - rc = scsi_device_reprobe(sdev); + WARN_ON(scsi_device_reprobe(sdev)); }
static void