3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mike Looijmans mike.looijmans@topic.nl
[ Upstream commit dbe4d69d252e9e65c6c46826980b77b11a142065 ]
The spec for the pca9546 was missing. This chip is the same as the pca9545 except that it lacks interrupt lines. While the i2c_device_id table mapped the pca9546 to the pca9545 definition the compatible table did not.
Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans mike.looijmans@topic.nl Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin peda@axentia.se Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@verizon.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c @@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ static const struct chip_desc chips[] = .nchans = 4, .muxtype = pca954x_isswi, }, + [pca_9546] = { + .nchans = 4, + .muxtype = pca954x_isswi, + }, [pca_9547] = { .nchans = 8, .enable = 0x8, @@ -110,7 +114,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id pca954 { "pca9543", pca_9543 }, { "pca9544", pca_9544 }, { "pca9545", pca_9545 }, - { "pca9546", pca_9545 }, + { "pca9546", pca_9546 }, { "pca9547", pca_9547 }, { "pca9548", pca_9548 }, { }