Thanks for pointing that out. I will review this, and send it to all relevant branches.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 at 16:37, Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:13:15PM +0200, Sergio González Collado wrote:
From: Dave Kleikamp dave.kleikamp@oracle.com
[ Upstream commit a779ed754e52d582b8c0e17959df063108bd0656 ]
In order to make array bounds checking sane, provide a separate definition of the in-inode xtree root and the external xtree page.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp dave.kleikamp@oracle.com Tested-by: Manas Ghandat ghandatmanas@gmail.com (cherry picked from commit a779ed754e52d582b8c0e17959df063108bd0656) Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado sergio.collado@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+6b1d79dad6cc6b3eef41@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
What about 6.6.y? We can't take commits only to older kernels, that would mean you would have a regression.
Please resubmit for all relevant branches.
greg k-h