6.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 867446f090589626497638f70b10be5e61a0b925 ]
The check that the new vector length we set was the expected one was typoed to an assignment statement which for some reason the compilers didn't spot, most likely due to the macros involved.
Fixes: a1d7111257cd ("selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface") Acked-by: Mark Rutland mark.rutland@arm.com Acked-by: Dev Jain dev.jain@arm.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250609-kselftest-arm64-ssve-fixups-v2-1-998fcfa6... Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c index 577b6e05e860..c499d5789dd5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static void ptrace_set_get_vl(pid_t child, const struct vec_type *type, return; }
- ksft_test_result(new_sve->vl = prctl_vl, "Set %s VL %u\n", + ksft_test_result(new_sve->vl == prctl_vl, "Set %s VL %u\n", type->name, vl);
free(new_sve);