Hi Ma,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on ras/edac-for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.11-rc3 next-20240815] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ma-Ke/EDAC-ti-Fix-possible-nu... base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git edac-for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240815014511.147065-1-make24%40iscas.ac.cn patch subject: [PATCH v4 RESEND] EDAC/ti: Fix possible null pointer dereference in _emif_get_id() config: arm-randconfig-002-20240816 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240816/202408160935.A6QFliqt-lkp@i...) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f86594788ce93b696675c94f54016d27a6c21d18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240816/202408160935.A6QFliqt-lkp@i...)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408160935.A6QFliqt-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/edac/ti_edac.c:28: In file included from drivers/edac/edac_module.h:15: In file included from drivers/edac/edac_mc.h:30: In file included from include/linux/pci.h:1646: In file included from include/linux/dmapool.h:14: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:8: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2228: include/linux/vmstat.h:514:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 514 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
drivers/edac/ti_edac.c:214:14: warning: result of comparison of constant 18446744073709551615 with expression of type 'u32' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
214 | if (my_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR) | ~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/edac/ti_edac.c:226:12: warning: result of comparison of constant 18446744073709551615 with expression of type 'u32' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare] 226 | if (addr == OF_BAD_ADDR) | ~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~ 3 warnings generated.
vim +214 drivers/edac/ti_edac.c
201 202 static int _emif_get_id(struct device_node *node) 203 { 204 struct device_node *np; 205 const __be32 *addrp; 206 u32 addr, my_addr; 207 int my_id = 0; 208 209 addrp = of_get_address(node, 0, NULL, NULL); 210 if (!addrp) 211 return -EINVAL; 212 213 my_addr = (u32)of_translate_address(node, addrp);
214 if (my_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR)
215 return -EINVAL; 216 217 for_each_matching_node(np, ti_edac_of_match) { 218 if (np == node) 219 continue; 220 221 addrp = of_get_address(np, 0, NULL, NULL); 222 if (!addrp) 223 return -EINVAL; 224 225 addr = (u32)of_translate_address(np, addrp); 226 if (addr == OF_BAD_ADDR) 227 return -EINVAL; 228 229 edac_printk(KERN_INFO, EDAC_MOD_NAME, 230 "addr=%x, my_addr=%x\n", 231 addr, my_addr); 232 233 if (addr < my_addr) 234 my_id++; 235 } 236 237 return my_id; 238 } 239