From: Vitaly Kuznetsov vkuznets@redhat.com
commit 50e523dd79f6a856d793ce5711719abe27cffbf2 upstream.
'struct kvm_hv_hcall' has all the required information already, there's no need to pass 'ex' additionally.
No functional change intended.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14.x Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov vkuznets@redhat.com Message-Id: 20220222154642.684285-2-vkuznets@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c @@ -1875,7 +1875,7 @@ static void kvm_send_ipi_to_many(struct } }
-static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc, bool ex) +static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc) { struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; struct hv_send_ipi_ex send_ipi_ex; @@ -1889,7 +1889,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vc u32 vector; bool all_cpus;
- if (!ex) { + if (hc->code == HVCALL_SEND_IPI) { if (!hc->fast) { if (unlikely(kvm_read_guest(kvm, hc->ingpa, &send_ipi, sizeof(send_ipi)))) @@ -2279,14 +2279,14 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vc ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT; break; } - ret = kvm_hv_send_ipi(vcpu, &hc, false); + ret = kvm_hv_send_ipi(vcpu, &hc); break; case HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX: if (unlikely(hc.fast || hc.rep)) { ret = HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT; break; } - ret = kvm_hv_send_ipi(vcpu, &hc, true); + ret = kvm_hv_send_ipi(vcpu, &hc); break; case HVCALL_POST_DEBUG_DATA: case HVCALL_RETRIEVE_DEBUG_DATA: