5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nathan Lynch nathanl@linux.ibm.com
commit 4f3175979e62de3b929bfa54a0db4b87d36257a7 upstream.
With hardened usercopy enabled (CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y), using the /proc/powerpc/rtas/firmware_update interface to prepare a system firmware update yields a BUG():
kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102! Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 2232 Comm: dd Not tainted 6.5.0-rc3+ #2 Hardware name: IBM,8408-E8E POWER8E (raw) 0x4b0201 0xf000004 of:IBM,FW860.50 (SV860_146) hv:phyp pSeries NIP: c0000000005991d0 LR: c0000000005991cc CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c0000000148c76a0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (6.5.0-rc3+) MSR: 8000000000029033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24002242 XER: 0000000c CFAR: c0000000001fbd34 IRQMASK: 0 [ ... GPRs omitted ... ] NIP usercopy_abort+0xa0/0xb0 LR usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xb0 Call Trace: usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xb0 (unreliable) __check_heap_object+0x1b4/0x1d0 __check_object_size+0x2d0/0x380 rtas_flash_write+0xe4/0x250 proc_reg_write+0xfc/0x160 vfs_write+0xfc/0x4e0 ksys_write+0x90/0x160 system_call_exception+0x178/0x320 system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
The blocks of the firmware image are copied directly from user memory to objects allocated from flash_block_cache, so flash_block_cache must be created using kmem_cache_create_usercopy() to mark it safe for user access.
Fixes: 6d07d1cd300f ("usercopy: Restrict non-usercopy caches to size 0") Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch nathanl@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org [mpe: Trim and indent oops] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au Link: https://msgid.link/20230810-rtas-flash-vs-hardened-usercopy-v2-1-dcf63793a93... Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c @@ -710,9 +710,9 @@ static int __init rtas_flash_init(void) if (!rtas_validate_flash_data.buf) return -ENOMEM;
- flash_block_cache = kmem_cache_create("rtas_flash_cache", - RTAS_BLK_SIZE, RTAS_BLK_SIZE, 0, - NULL); + flash_block_cache = kmem_cache_create_usercopy("rtas_flash_cache", + RTAS_BLK_SIZE, RTAS_BLK_SIZE, + 0, 0, RTAS_BLK_SIZE, NULL); if (!flash_block_cache) { printk(KERN_ERR "%s: failed to create block cache\n", __func__);