From: Jiri Slaby jslaby@suse.cz
[ Upstream commit f2ac57a4c49d40409c21c82d23b5706df9b438af ]
GCC 10 optimizes the scheduler code differently than its predecessors.
When CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y, the Makefile forces GCC not to inline some functions (-fno-inline-functions-called-once). Before GCC 10, "no-inlined" __schedule() starts with the usual prologue:
push %bp mov %sp, %bp
So the ORC unwinder simply picks stack pointer from %bp and unwinds from __schedule() just perfectly:
$ cat /proc/1/stack [<0>] ep_poll+0x3e9/0x450 [<0>] do_epoll_wait+0xaa/0xc0 [<0>] __x64_sys_epoll_wait+0x1a/0x20 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
But now, with GCC 10, there is no %bp prologue in __schedule():
$ cat /proc/1/stack <nothing>
The ORC entry of the point in __schedule() is:
sp:sp+88 bp:last_sp-48 type:call end:0
In this case, nobody subtracts sizeof "struct inactive_task_frame" in __unwind_start(). The struct is put on the stack by __switch_to_asm() and only then __switch_to_asm() stores %sp to task->thread.sp. But we start unwinding from a point in __schedule() (stored in frame->ret_addr by 'call') and not in __switch_to_asm().
So for these example values in __unwind_start():
sp=ffff94b50001fdc8 bp=ffff8e1f41d29340 ip=__schedule+0x1f0
The stack is:
ffff94b50001fdc8: ffff8e1f41578000 # struct inactive_task_frame ffff94b50001fdd0: 0000000000000000 ffff94b50001fdd8: ffff8e1f41d29340 ffff94b50001fde0: ffff8e1f41611d40 # ... ffff94b50001fde8: ffffffff93c41920 # bx ffff94b50001fdf0: ffff8e1f41d29340 # bp ffff94b50001fdf8: ffffffff9376cad0 # ret_addr (and end of the struct)
0xffffffff9376cad0 is __schedule+0x1f0 (after the call to __switch_to_asm). Now follow those 88 bytes from the ORC entry (sp+88). The entry is correct, __schedule() really pushes 48 bytes (8*7) + 32 bytes via subq to store some local values (like 4U below). So to unwind, look at the offset 88-sizeof(long) = 0x50 from here:
ffff94b50001fe00: ffff8e1f41578618 ffff94b50001fe08: 00000cc000000255 ffff94b50001fe10: 0000000500000004 ffff94b50001fe18: 7793fab6956b2d00 # NOTE (see below) ffff94b50001fe20: ffff8e1f41578000 ffff94b50001fe28: ffff8e1f41578000 ffff94b50001fe30: ffff8e1f41578000 ffff94b50001fe38: ffff8e1f41578000 ffff94b50001fe40: ffff94b50001fed8 ffff94b50001fe48: ffff8e1f41577ff0 ffff94b50001fe50: ffffffff9376cf12
Here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is the correct ret addr from __schedule(). It translates to schedule+0x42 (insn after a call to __schedule()).
BUT, unwind_next_frame() tries to take the address starting from 0xffff94b50001fdc8. That is exactly from thread.sp+88-sizeof(long) = 0xffff94b50001fdc8+88-8 = 0xffff94b50001fe18, which is garbage marked as NOTE above. So this quits the unwinding as 7793fab6956b2d00 is obviously not a kernel address.
There was a fix to skip 'struct inactive_task_frame' in unwind_get_return_address_ptr in the following commit:
187b96db5ca7 ("x86/unwind/orc: Fix unwind_get_return_address_ptr() for inactive tasks")
But we need to skip the struct already in the unwinder proper. So subtract the size (increase the stack pointer) of the structure in __unwind_start() directly. This allows for removal of the code added by commit 187b96db5ca7 completely, as the address is now at '(unsigned long *)state->sp - 1', the same as in the generic case.
[ mingo: Cleaned up the changelog a bit, for better readability. ]
Fixes: ee9f8fce9964 ("x86/unwind: Add the ORC unwinder") Bug: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176907 Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby jslaby@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201014053051.24199-1-jslaby@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c index 187a86e0e7531..f29f015a5e7f3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c @@ -311,19 +311,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unwind_get_return_address);
unsigned long *unwind_get_return_address_ptr(struct unwind_state *state) { - struct task_struct *task = state->task; - if (unwind_done(state)) return NULL;
if (state->regs) return &state->regs->ip;
- if (task != current && state->sp == task->thread.sp) { - struct inactive_task_frame *frame = (void *)task->thread.sp; - return &frame->ret_addr; - } - if (state->sp) return (unsigned long *)state->sp - 1;
@@ -653,7 +646,7 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task, } else { struct inactive_task_frame *frame = (void *)task->thread.sp;
- state->sp = task->thread.sp; + state->sp = task->thread.sp + sizeof(*frame); state->bp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->bp); state->ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->ret_addr); state->signal = (void *)state->ip == ret_from_fork;