5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Johannes Thumshirn johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com
commit 74098a989b9c3370f768140b7783a7aaec2759b3 upstream.
At the moment scrub_supers() doesn't grab the super block's location via the zoned device aware btrfs_sb_log_location() but via btrfs_sb_offset().
This leads to checksum errors on 'scrub' as we're not accessing the correct location of the super block.
So use btrfs_sb_log_location() for getting the super blocks location on scrub.
Reported-by: WA AM waautomata@gmail.com Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CANU2Z0EvUzfYxczLgGUiREoMndE9WdQnbaawV5Fv... CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota naohiro.aota@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -3972,7 +3972,17 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_supe gen = fs_info->last_trans_committed;
for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) { - bytenr = btrfs_sb_offset(i); + ret = btrfs_sb_log_location(scrub_dev, i, 0, &bytenr); + if (ret == -ENOENT) + break; + + if (ret) { + spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock); + sctx->stat.super_errors++; + spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock); + continue; + } + if (bytenr + BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE > scrub_dev->commit_total_bytes) break;