4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Lu Fengqi lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
commit fcd5e74288f7d36991b1f0fb96b8c57079645e38 upstream.
When running generic/475, we may get the following warning in dmesg:
[ 6902.102154] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18013 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9776 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2af/0x3b0 [btrfs] [ 6902.109160] CPU: 3 PID: 18013 Comm: umount Tainted: G W O 4.19.0-rc8+ #8 [ 6902.110971] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 6902.112857] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2af/0x3b0 [btrfs] [ 6902.118921] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000459bdb0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 6902.120315] RAX: ffff880175050bb0 RBX: ffff8801124a8000 RCX: 0000000000170007 [ 6902.121969] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000170007 RDI: ffffffff8125fb74 [ 6902.123716] RBP: ffff880175055d10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 6902.125417] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880175055d88 [ 6902.127129] R13: ffff880175050bb0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dead000000000100 [ 6902.129060] FS: 00007f4507223780(0000) GS:ffff88017ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 6902.130996] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 6902.132558] CR2: 00005623599cac78 CR3: 000000014b700001 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [ 6902.134270] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 6902.135981] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 6902.137836] Call Trace: [ 6902.138939] close_ctree+0x171/0x330 [btrfs] [ 6902.140181] ? kthread_stop+0x146/0x1f0 [ 6902.141277] generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 [ 6902.142517] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [ 6902.143554] btrfs_kill_super+0x13/0x100 [btrfs] [ 6902.144790] deactivate_locked_super+0x2f/0x70 [ 6902.146014] cleanup_mnt+0x3b/0x70 [ 6902.147020] task_work_run+0x9e/0xd0 [ 6902.148036] do_syscall_64+0x470/0x600 [ 6902.149142] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 6902.150375] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 6902.151640] RIP: 0033:0x7f45077a6a7b [ 6902.157324] RSP: 002b:00007ffd589f3e68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [ 6902.159187] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000055e8eec732b0 RCX: 00007f45077a6a7b [ 6902.160834] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000055e8eec73490 [ 6902.162526] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000055e8eec734b0 R09: 00007ffd589f26c0 [ 6902.164141] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055e8eec73490 [ 6902.165815] R13: 00007f4507ac61a4 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd589f40d8 [ 6902.167553] irq event stamp: 0 [ 6902.168998] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] (null) [ 6902.170731] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff810cd810>] copy_process.part.55+0x3b0/0x1f00 [ 6902.172773] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff810cd810>] copy_process.part.55+0x3b0/0x1f00 [ 6902.174671] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] (null) [ 6902.176407] ---[ end trace 463138c2986b275c ]--- [ 6902.177636] BTRFS info (device dm-3): space_info 4 has 273465344 free, is not full [ 6902.179453] BTRFS info (device dm-3): space_info total=276824064, used=4685824, pinned=18446744073708158976, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=65536
In the above line there's "pinned=18446744073708158976" which is an unsigned u64 value of -1392640, an obvious underflow.
When transaction_kthread is running cleanup_transaction(), another fsstress is running btrfs_commit_transaction(). The btrfs_finish_extent_commit() may get the same range as btrfs_destroy_pinned_extent() got, which causes the pinned underflow.
Fixes: d4b450cd4b33 ("Btrfs: fix race between transaction commit and empty block group removal") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -4404,13 +4404,23 @@ static int btrfs_destroy_pinned_extent(s unpin = pinned_extents; again: while (1) { + /* + * The btrfs_finish_extent_commit() may get the same range as + * ours between find_first_extent_bit and clear_extent_dirty. + * Hence, hold the unused_bg_unpin_mutex to avoid double unpin + * the same extent range. + */ + mutex_lock(&fs_info->unused_bg_unpin_mutex); ret = find_first_extent_bit(unpin, 0, &start, &end, EXTENT_DIRTY, NULL); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + mutex_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bg_unpin_mutex); break; + }
clear_extent_dirty(unpin, start, end); btrfs_error_unpin_extent_range(fs_info, start, end); + mutex_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bg_unpin_mutex); cond_resched(); }