From: Johannes Weiner hannes@cmpxchg.org
commit cd324edce598ebddde44162a2aa01321c1261b9e upstream.
Tejun reports seeing rare div0 crashes in memory.low stress testing:
RIP: 0010:mem_cgroup_calculate_protection+0xed/0x150 Code: 0f 46 d1 4c 39 d8 72 57 f6 05 16 d6 42 01 40 74 1f 4c 39 d8 76 1a 4c 39 d1 76 15 4c 29 d1 4c 29 d8 4d 29 d9 31 d2 48 0f af c1 <49> f7 f1 49 01 c2 4c 89 96 38 01 00 00 5d c3 48 0f af c7 31 d2 49 RSP: 0018:ffffa14e01d6fcd0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 000000000243e384 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000008f4b RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8b89bee84000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffa14e01d6fcd0 R08: ffff8b89ca7d40f8 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 00000000006422f7 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff8b89d9617000 R14: ffff8b89bee84000 R15: ffffa14e01d6fdb8 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8b8a1f1c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f93b1fc175b CR3: 000000016100a000 CR4: 0000000000340ea0 Call Trace: shrink_node+0x1e5/0x6c0 balance_pgdat+0x32d/0x5f0 kswapd+0x1d7/0x3d0 kthread+0x11c/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
This happens when parent_usage == siblings_protected.
We check that usage is bigger than protected, which should imply parent_usage being bigger than siblings_protected. However, we don't read (or even update) these values atomically, and they can be out of sync as the memory state changes under us. A bit of fluctuation around the target protection isn't a big deal, but we need to handle the div0 case.
Check the parent state explicitly to make sure we have a reasonable positive value for the divisor.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200615140658.601684-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org Fixes: 8a931f801340 ("mm: memcontrol: recursive memory.low protection") Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner hannes@cmpxchg.org Reported-by: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org Acked-by: Michal Hocko mhocko@suse.com Acked-by: Chris Down chris@chrisdown.name Cc: Roman Gushchin guro@fb.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- mm/memcontrol.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index a3b97f1039665..1b05e25d8aef2 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -6349,11 +6349,16 @@ static unsigned long effective_protection(unsigned long usage, * We're using unprotected memory for the weight so that if * some cgroups DO claim explicit protection, we don't protect * the same bytes twice. + * + * Check both usage and parent_usage against the respective + * protected values. One should imply the other, but they + * aren't read atomically - make sure the division is sane. */ if (!(cgrp_dfl_root.flags & CGRP_ROOT_MEMORY_RECURSIVE_PROT)) return ep; - - if (parent_effective > siblings_protected && usage > protected) { + if (parent_effective > siblings_protected && + parent_usage > siblings_protected && + usage > protected) { unsigned long unclaimed;
unclaimed = parent_effective - siblings_protected;