On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:25:07AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 7/23/22 08:52, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:57:19AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
commit 58ecb11eab44dd5d64e35664ac4d62fecb6328f4 upstream.
Again, not a valid commit :(
Where did these come from?
confused,
There are on Mark Brown's for-next branch, I must have looked at the IDs after a rebase or something. We always report the SHA IDs from that for-next branch, and linux-next check those values. I didn't realize they could be different in Linus' tree.
I am still a bit confused since our Fixes tag could be right at the moment we submit the patches to Mark but wrong long-term after merge by Linus. Either I need more coffee, or I am missing a key concept, or both.
The commit IDs on Linus' tree should be:
a933084558c6 ASoC: SOF: pm: add explicit behavior for ACPI S1 and S2
9d2d46271338 ASoC: SOF: pm: add definitions for S4 and S5 states
391153522d18 ASoC: SOF: Intel: disable IMR boot when resuming from ACPI S4 and S5 states
Do you want me to resend?
Yes please.