On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:49:05AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 3:33 AM Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com wrote:
Thus, it makes sense to fix this also in tpm_crb, not least because the fix can be then backported to stable kernels and make them more robust when compiled in differing environments.
Ack, looks sane to me, and should help both the backport and probably generate better code too.
In the meantime, I've committed the iomem.c change with a *long* commit message. For all we know, there might be other cases like this lurking somewhere else that just happened to work. Plus it's the right thing to do anyway.
Linus
Great!
Umh, so, should my tpm_crb change committed to 5.0 with the minor changes implemented suggested by Tomas or not? Can also include it to my 5.1 PR. Either WFM.
/Jarkko