From: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
commit 7af0145067bc429a09ac4047b167c0971c9f0dc7 upstream.
ftrace does not use text_poke() for enabling trace functionality. It uses its own mechanism and flips the whole kernel text to RW and back to RO.
The CPA rework removed a loop based check of 4k pages which tried to preserve a large page by checking each 4k page whether the change would actually cover all pages in the large page.
This resulted in endless loops for nothing as in testing it turned out that it actually never preserved anything. Of course testing missed to include ftrace, which is the one and only case which benefitted from the 4k loop.
As a consequence enabling function tracing or ftrace based kprobes results in a full 4k split of the kernel text, which affects iTLB performance.
The kernel RO protection is the only valid case where this can actually preserve large pages.
All other static protections (RO data, data NX, PCI, BIOS) are truly static. So a conflict with those protections which results in a split should only ever happen when a change of memory next to a protected region is attempted. But these conflicts are rightfully splitting the large page to preserve the protected regions. In fact a change to the protected regions itself is a bug and is warned about.
Add an exception for the static protection check for kernel text RO when the to be changed region spawns a full large page which allows to preserve the large mappings. This also prevents the syslog to be spammed about CPA violations when ftrace is used.
The exception needs to be removed once ftrace switched over to text_poke() which avoids the whole issue.
Fixes: 585948f4f695 ("x86/mm/cpa: Avoid the 4k pages check completely") Reported-by: Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Tested-by: Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com Reviewed-by: Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1908282355340.1938@nanos.tec.linut... Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static inline void check_conflict(int wa */ static inline pgprot_t static_protections(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long start, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long npg, - int warnlvl) + unsigned long lpsize, int warnlvl) { pgprotval_t forbidden, res; unsigned long end; @@ -535,9 +535,17 @@ static inline pgprot_t static_protection check_conflict(warnlvl, prot, res, start, end, pfn, "Text NX"); forbidden = res;
- res = protect_kernel_text_ro(start, end); - check_conflict(warnlvl, prot, res, start, end, pfn, "Text RO"); - forbidden |= res; + /* + * Special case to preserve a large page. If the change spawns the + * full large page mapping then there is no point to split it + * up. Happens with ftrace and is going to be removed once ftrace + * switched to text_poke(). + */ + if (lpsize != (npg * PAGE_SIZE) || (start & (lpsize - 1))) { + res = protect_kernel_text_ro(start, end); + check_conflict(warnlvl, prot, res, start, end, pfn, "Text RO"); + forbidden |= res; + }
/* Check the PFN directly */ res = protect_pci_bios(pfn, pfn + npg - 1); @@ -819,7 +827,7 @@ static int __should_split_large_page(pte * extra conditional required here. */ chk_prot = static_protections(old_prot, lpaddr, old_pfn, numpages, - CPA_CONFLICT); + psize, CPA_CONFLICT);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pgprot_val(chk_prot) != pgprot_val(old_prot))) { /* @@ -855,7 +863,7 @@ static int __should_split_large_page(pte * protection requirement in the large page. */ new_prot = static_protections(req_prot, lpaddr, old_pfn, numpages, - CPA_DETECT); + psize, CPA_DETECT);
/* * If there is a conflict, split the large page. @@ -906,7 +914,8 @@ static void split_set_pte(struct cpa_dat if (!cpa->force_static_prot) goto set;
- prot = static_protections(ref_prot, address, pfn, npg, CPA_PROTECT); + /* Hand in lpsize = 0 to enforce the protection mechanism */ + prot = static_protections(ref_prot, address, pfn, npg, 0, CPA_PROTECT);
if (pgprot_val(prot) == pgprot_val(ref_prot)) goto set; @@ -1503,7 +1512,8 @@ repeat: pgprot_val(new_prot) |= pgprot_val(cpa->mask_set);
cpa_inc_4k_install(); - new_prot = static_protections(new_prot, address, pfn, 1, + /* Hand in lpsize = 0 to enforce the protection mechanism */ + new_prot = static_protections(new_prot, address, pfn, 1, 0, CPA_PROTECT);
new_prot = pgprot_clear_protnone_bits(new_prot);