6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn
[ Upstream commit c2b2ee36250d967c21890cb801e24af4b6a9eaa5 ]
It appears that there is a typo in the code where the nlattr array is being parsed with policy br_cfm_cc_ccm_tx_policy, but the instance is being accessed via IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_RDI_INSTANCE, which is associated with the policy br_cfm_cc_rdi_policy.
This problem was introduced by commit 2be665c3940d ("bridge: cfm: Netlink SET configuration Interface.").
Though it seems like a harmless typo since these two enum owns the exact same value (1 here), it is quite misleading hence fix it by using the correct enum IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_INSTANCE here.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn Reviewed-by: Simon Horman horms@kernel.org Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov razor@blackwall.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c index 5c4c369f8536..2faab44652e7 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_cfm_netlink.c @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int br_cc_ccm_tx_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct nlattr *attr,
memset(&tx_info, 0, sizeof(tx_info));
- instance = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_RDI_INSTANCE]); + instance = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_INSTANCE]); nla_memcpy(&tx_info.dmac.addr, tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_CFM_CC_CCM_TX_DMAC], sizeof(tx_info.dmac.addr));