On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 08:47:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 01:41:20PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
)Hello!
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 13:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:42:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On stable rc 5.11 sparc allnoconfig and tinyconfig failed with gcc-8, gcc-9 and gcc-10.
make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=sparc CROSS_COMPILE=sparc64-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache sparc64-linux-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' <stdin>:1335:2: warning: #warning syscall rseq not implemented [-Wcpp] In file included from include/net/ndisc.h:50, from include/net/ipv6.h:21, from include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h:28, from include/linux/nfs_fs.h:32, from init/do_mounts.c:22: include/linux/icmpv6.h: In function 'icmpv6_ndo_send': include/linux/icmpv6.h:70:2: error: implicit declaration of function '__icmpv6_send'; did you mean 'icmpv6_send'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 70 | __icmpv6_send(skb_in, type, code, info, &parm); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ | icmpv6_send cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:304: init/do_mounts.o] Error 1
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org
What is the odds that Linus's tree also fails with this configuration and arch right now?
We don't see this kind of failure (or any failure whatsoever) on mainline (Linux 5.12-rc1) at the moment.
Odd, ok, let me dig into this in the morning, I might have missed something that needed to be backported here...
Found it, needed one more patch backported. Now passes my local tests, will push out new -rcs now...
thanks,
greg k-h