4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com
Commit 90348689d500 upstream.
For those CPUs that require PSCI to perform a BP invalidation, going all the way to the PSCI code for not much is a waste of precious cycles. Let's terminate that call as early as possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h> #include <linux/jump_label.h> +#include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
#include <asm/kvm_asm.h> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h> @@ -341,6 +342,18 @@ again: if (exit_code == ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP && !__populate_fault_info(vcpu)) goto again;
+ if (exit_code == ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP && + (kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64 || + kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32) && + vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) == PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION) { + u64 val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; + if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2, vcpu->arch.features)) + val = 2; + + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val); + goto again; + } + if (static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v2_cpuif_trap) && exit_code == ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP) { bool valid;