3.16.61-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Hutchings ben@decadent.org.uk
This was done as part of commit 08a77676f9c5 upstream, from which the following description is taken:
strlcpy() is worse than strlcpy() because it unconditionally runs strlen() on the source string, and the only reason we switched to strlcpy() here was because it was lacking __must_check, which doesn't reflect any material differences between the two function. It's just that someone added __must_check to strscpy() and not to strlcpy().
These basic string copy operations are used in variety of ways, and one of not-so-uncommon use cases is safely handling truncated copies, where the caller naturally doesn't care about the return value. The __must_check doesn't match the actual use cases and forces users to opt for inferior variants which lack __must_check by happenstance or spread ugly (void) casts.
Cc: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings ben@decadent.org.uk --- --- a/include/linux/string.h +++ b/include/linux/string.h @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ extern char * strncpy(char *,const char size_t strlcpy(char *, const char *, size_t); #endif #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_STRSCPY -ssize_t __must_check strscpy(char *, const char *, size_t); +ssize_t strscpy(char *, const char *, size_t); #endif #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_STRCAT extern char * strcat(char *, const char *);