4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Masayoshi Mizuma m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com
commit 295cc7eb314eb3321fb6d67ca6f7305f5c50d10f upstream.
When a physical CPU is hot-removed, the following warning messages are shown while the uncore device is removed in uncore_pci_remove():
WARNING: CPU: 120 PID: 5 at arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c:988 uncore_pci_remove+0xf1/0x110 ... CPU: 120 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/u1024:0 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc8 #1 Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug acpi_hotplug_work_fn ... Call Trace: pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0 device_release_driver_internal+0x145/0x210 pci_stop_bus_device+0x76/0xa0 pci_stop_root_bus+0x44/0x60 acpi_pci_root_remove+0x1f/0x80 acpi_bus_trim+0x54/0x90 acpi_bus_trim+0x2e/0x90 acpi_device_hotplug+0x2bc/0x4b0 acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1a/0x30 process_one_work+0x141/0x340 worker_thread+0x47/0x3e0 kthread+0xf5/0x130
When uncore_pci_remove() runs, it tries to get the package ID to clear the value of uncore_extra_pci_dev[].dev[] by using topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(). The warning messesages are shown because topology_phys_to_logical_pkg() returns -1.
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c: static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) { ... phys_id = uncore_pcibus_to_physid(pdev->bus); ... pkg = topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(phys_id); // returns -1 for (i = 0; i < UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX; i++) { if (uncore_extra_pci_dev[pkg].dev[i] == pdev) { uncore_extra_pci_dev[pkg].dev[i] = NULL; break; } } WARN_ON_ONCE(i >= UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX); // <=========== HERE!!
topology_phys_to_logical_pkg() tries to find cpuinfo_x86->phys_proc_id that matches the phys_pkg argument.
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c: int topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(unsigned int phys_pkg) { int cpu;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
if (c->initialized && c->phys_proc_id == phys_pkg) return c->logical_proc_id; } return -1; }
However, the phys_proc_id was already set to 0 by remove_siblinginfo() when the CPU was offlined.
So, topology_phys_to_logical_pkg() cannot find the correct logical_proc_id and always returns -1.
As the result, uncore_pci_remove() calls WARN_ON_ONCE() and the warning messages are shown.
What is worse is that the bogus 'pkg' index results in two bugs:
- We dereference uncore_extra_pci_dev[] with a negative index - We fail to clean up a stale pointer in uncore_extra_pci_dev[][]
To fix these bugs, remove the clearing of ->phys_proc_id from remove_siblinginfo().
This should not cause any problems, because ->phys_proc_id is not used after it is hot-removed and it is re-set while hot-adding.
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org Cc: yasu.isimatu@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 30bb9811856f ("x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id array") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ed738d54-0f01-b38b-b794-c31dc118c207@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c @@ -1431,7 +1431,6 @@ static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu) cpumask_clear(cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)); cpumask_clear(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)); cpumask_clear(topology_core_cpumask(cpu)); - c->phys_proc_id = 0; c->cpu_core_id = 0; cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_setup_mask); recompute_smt_state();