The patch titled Subject: ocfs2: mount fails with buffer overflow in strlen has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is ocfs2-mount-fails-with-buffer-overflow-in-strlen.patch
This patch should soon appear at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/ocfs2-mount-fails-with-buffer-over... and later at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/ocfs2-mount-fails-with-buffer-over...
Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------ From: Valentin Vidic vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hr Subject: ocfs2: mount fails with buffer overflow in strlen
Starting with kernel 5.11 built with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE mouting an ocfs2 filesystem with either o2cb or pcmk cluster stack fails with the trace below. Problem seems to be that strings for cluster stack and cluster name are not guaranteed to be null terminated in the disk representation, while strlcpy assumes that the source string is always null terminated. This causes a read outside of the source string triggering the buffer overflow detection.
detected buffer overflow in strlen ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/string.c:1149! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 910 Comm: mount.ocfs2 Not tainted 5.14.0-1-amd64 #1 Debian 5.14.6-2 RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0xf/0x11 ... Call Trace: ocfs2_initialize_super.isra.0.cold+0xc/0x18 [ocfs2] ocfs2_fill_super+0x359/0x19b0 [ocfs2] mount_bdev+0x185/0x1b0 ? ocfs2_remount+0x440/0x440 [ocfs2] legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xb0 path_mount+0x454/0xa20 __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210929180654.32460-1-vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.... Signed-off-by: Valentin Vidic vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hr Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com Cc: Mark Fasheh mark@fasheh.com Cc: Joel Becker jlbec@evilplan.org Cc: Junxiao Bi junxiao.bi@oracle.com Cc: Changwei Ge gechangwei@live.cn Cc: Gang He ghe@suse.com Cc: Jun Piao piaojun@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---
fs/ocfs2/super.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c~ocfs2-mount-fails-with-buffer-overflow-in-strlen +++ a/fs/ocfs2/super.c @@ -2167,11 +2167,17 @@ static int ocfs2_initialize_super(struct }
if (ocfs2_clusterinfo_valid(osb)) { + /* + * ci_stack and ci_cluster in ocfs2_cluster_info may not be null + * terminated, so make sure no overflow happens here by using + * memcpy. Destination strings will always be null terminated + * because osb is allocated using kzalloc. + */ osb->osb_stackflags = OCFS2_RAW_SB(di)->s_cluster_info.ci_stackflags; - strlcpy(osb->osb_cluster_stack, + memcpy(osb->osb_cluster_stack, OCFS2_RAW_SB(di)->s_cluster_info.ci_stack, - OCFS2_STACK_LABEL_LEN + 1); + OCFS2_STACK_LABEL_LEN); if (strlen(osb->osb_cluster_stack) != OCFS2_STACK_LABEL_LEN) { mlog(ML_ERROR, "couldn't mount because of an invalid " @@ -2180,9 +2186,9 @@ static int ocfs2_initialize_super(struct status = -EINVAL; goto bail; } - strlcpy(osb->osb_cluster_name, + memcpy(osb->osb_cluster_name, OCFS2_RAW_SB(di)->s_cluster_info.ci_cluster, - OCFS2_CLUSTER_NAME_LEN + 1); + OCFS2_CLUSTER_NAME_LEN); } else { /* The empty string is identical with classic tools that * don't know about s_cluster_info. */ _
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hr are
ocfs2-mount-fails-with-buffer-overflow-in-strlen.patch