On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 07:33:44AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Jarkko,
Am 31.05.21 um 06:51 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
Do not torn down the system when getting invalid status from a TPM chip.
Nit: Do not *tear* down …?
Oops, a typo, thank you.
This can happen when panic-on-warn is used.
Hmm, I’d say it works as expected then? Shouldn’t an invalid status of an important device like TPM considered a warning?
By warning do you mean WARN() or pr_warn()?
/Jarkko