6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 4207b556e62f0a8915afc5da4c5d5ad915a253a5 ]
The BPF helper bpf_cgroup_from_id() calls kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() which acquires kernfs_idr_lock, which is an non-raw non-IRQ-safe lock. This can lead to deadlocks as bpf_cgroup_from_id() can be called from any BPF programs including e.g. the ones that attach to functions which are holding the scheduler rq lock.
Consider the following BPF program:
SEC("fentry/__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked") int BPF_PROG(__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked, struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *affn_ctx, struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(p->cgroups->dfl_cgrp->kn->id);
if (cgrp) { bpf_printk("%d[%s] in %s", p->pid, p->comm, cgrp->kn->name); bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp); } return 0; }
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked() is called with rq lock held and the above BPF program calls bpf_cgroup_from_id() within leading to the following lockdep warning:
===================================================== WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.7.0-rc3-work-00053-g07124366a1d7-dirty #147 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- repro/1620 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ffffffff833b3688 (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70
and this task is already holding: ffff888237ced698 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: task_rq_lock+0x4e/0xf0 which would create a new lock dependency: (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} ... Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(kernfs_idr_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&rq->__lock); lock(kernfs_idr_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->__lock);
*** DEADLOCK *** ... Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x781/0x2a40 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70 cgroup_get_from_id+0x21/0x240 bpf_cgroup_from_id+0xe/0x20 bpf_prog_98652316e9337a5a___set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x96/0x11a bpf_trampoline_6442545632+0x4f/0x1000 __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x5/0x5a0 sched_setaffinity+0x1b3/0x290 __x64_sys_sched_setaffinity+0x4f/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
Let's fix it by protecting kernfs_node and kernfs_root with RCU and making kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() acquire rcu_read_lock() instead of kernfs_idr_lock.
This adds an rcu_head to kernfs_node making it larger by 16 bytes on 64bit. Combined with the preceding rearrange patch, the net increase is 8 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org Cc: Andrea Righi andrea.righi@canonical.com Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven geert@linux-m68k.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240109214828.252092-4-tj@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/kernfs/dir.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h | 2 ++ include/linux/kernfs.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c index 62d39ecf0a466..2405aeb39b9a2 100644 --- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c @@ -529,6 +529,20 @@ void kernfs_get(struct kernfs_node *kn) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernfs_get);
+static void kernfs_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu) +{ + struct kernfs_node *kn = container_of(rcu, struct kernfs_node, rcu); + + kfree_const(kn->name); + + if (kn->iattr) { + simple_xattrs_free(&kn->iattr->xattrs, NULL); + kmem_cache_free(kernfs_iattrs_cache, kn->iattr); + } + + kmem_cache_free(kernfs_node_cache, kn); +} + /** * kernfs_put - put a reference count on a kernfs_node * @kn: the target kernfs_node @@ -557,16 +571,11 @@ void kernfs_put(struct kernfs_node *kn) if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_LINK) kernfs_put(kn->symlink.target_kn);
- kfree_const(kn->name); - - if (kn->iattr) { - simple_xattrs_free(&kn->iattr->xattrs, NULL); - kmem_cache_free(kernfs_iattrs_cache, kn->iattr); - } spin_lock(&kernfs_idr_lock); idr_remove(&root->ino_idr, (u32)kernfs_ino(kn)); spin_unlock(&kernfs_idr_lock); - kmem_cache_free(kernfs_node_cache, kn); + + call_rcu(&kn->rcu, kernfs_free_rcu);
kn = parent; if (kn) { @@ -575,7 +584,7 @@ void kernfs_put(struct kernfs_node *kn) } else { /* just released the root kn, free @root too */ idr_destroy(&root->ino_idr); - kfree(root); + kfree_rcu(root, rcu); } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernfs_put); @@ -715,7 +724,7 @@ struct kernfs_node *kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id(struct kernfs_root *root, ino_t ino = kernfs_id_ino(id); u32 gen = kernfs_id_gen(id);
- spin_lock(&kernfs_idr_lock); + rcu_read_lock();
kn = idr_find(&root->ino_idr, (u32)ino); if (!kn) @@ -739,10 +748,10 @@ struct kernfs_node *kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id(struct kernfs_root *root, if (unlikely(!__kernfs_active(kn) || !atomic_inc_not_zero(&kn->count))) goto err_unlock;
- spin_unlock(&kernfs_idr_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); return kn; err_unlock: - spin_unlock(&kernfs_idr_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); return NULL; }
diff --git a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h index a9b854cdfdb5f..210dac7e9ee25 100644 --- a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h +++ b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ struct kernfs_root { struct rw_semaphore kernfs_rwsem; struct rw_semaphore kernfs_iattr_rwsem; struct rw_semaphore kernfs_supers_rwsem; + + struct rcu_head rcu; };
/* +1 to avoid triggering overflow warning when negating it */ diff --git a/include/linux/kernfs.h b/include/linux/kernfs.h index 2a36f3218b510..5a952d00ea159 100644 --- a/include/linux/kernfs.h +++ b/include/linux/kernfs.h @@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ struct kernfs_node { unsigned short flags; umode_t mode; struct kernfs_iattrs *iattr; + + struct rcu_head rcu; };
/*