From: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com
[ Upstream commit 7e4a3f7ed5d54926ec671bbb13e171cfe179cc50 ]
We are currently treating any non-zero return value from btrfs_next_leaf() the same way, by going to the code that inserts a new checksum item in the tree. However if btrfs_next_leaf() returns an error (a value < 0), we should just stop and return the error, and not behave as if nothing has happened, since in that case we do not have a way to know if there is a next leaf or we are currently at the last leaf already.
So fix that by returning the error from btrfs_next_leaf().
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c index 58ece6558430..fb5c97ea670f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c @@ -742,10 +742,12 @@ again: nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0]); if (!nritems || (path->slots[0] >= nritems - 1)) { ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path); - if (ret == 1) + if (ret < 0) { + goto out; + } else if (ret > 0) { found_next = 1; - if (ret != 0) goto insert; + } slot = path->slots[0]; } btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &found_key, slot);