6.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 658a52344fb139f9531e7543a6e0015b630feb38 ]
The maximum value of flexbg_size is 2^31, but the maximum value of int is (2^31 - 1), so overflow may occur when the type of flexbg_size is declared as int.
For example, when uninit_mask is initialized in ext4_alloc_group_tables(), if flexbg_size == 2^31, the initialized uninit_mask is incorrect, and this may causes set_flexbg_block_bitmap() to trigger a BUG_ON().
Therefore, the flexbg_size type is declared as unsigned int to avoid overflow and memory waste.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023013057.2117948-2-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu Stable-dep-of: 5d1935ac02ca ("ext4: avoid online resizing failures due to oversized flex bg") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/ext4/resize.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c index 4fe061edefdd..c6d4539d4c1f 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ struct ext4_new_flex_group_data { * * Returns NULL on failure otherwise address of the allocated structure. */ -static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned long flexbg_size) +static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned int flexbg_size) { struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd;
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static void free_flex_gd(struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd) */ static int ext4_alloc_group_tables(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd, - int flexbg_size) + unsigned int flexbg_size) { struct ext4_new_group_data *group_data = flex_gd->groups; ext4_fsblk_t start_blk; @@ -384,12 +384,12 @@ static int ext4_alloc_group_tables(struct super_block *sb, group = group_data[0].group;
printk(KERN_DEBUG "EXT4-fs: adding a flex group with " - "%d groups, flexbg size is %d:\n", flex_gd->count, + "%u groups, flexbg size is %u:\n", flex_gd->count, flexbg_size);
for (i = 0; i < flex_gd->count; i++) { ext4_debug( - "adding %s group %u: %u blocks (%d free, %d mdata blocks)\n", + "adding %s group %u: %u blocks (%u free, %u mdata blocks)\n", ext4_bg_has_super(sb, group + i) ? "normal" : "no-super", group + i, group_data[i].blocks_count, @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ static int ext4_flex_group_add(struct super_block *sb, static int ext4_setup_next_flex_gd(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd, ext4_fsblk_t n_blocks_count, - unsigned long flexbg_size) + unsigned int flexbg_size) { struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); struct ext4_super_block *es = sbi->s_es; @@ -1990,8 +1990,9 @@ int ext4_resize_fs(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t n_blocks_count) ext4_fsblk_t o_blocks_count; ext4_fsblk_t n_blocks_count_retry = 0; unsigned long last_update_time = 0; - int err = 0, flexbg_size = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex; + int err = 0; int meta_bg; + unsigned int flexbg_size = ext4_flex_bg_size(sbi);
/* See if the device is actually as big as what was requested */ bh = ext4_sb_bread(sb, n_blocks_count - 1, 0);