From: Mike Rapoport rppt@linux.ibm.com
[ Upstream commit a024b7c2850dddd01e65b8270f0971deaf272f27 ]
Commit 34dc2efb39a2 ("memblock: fix section mismatch warning") marked memblock_bottom_up() and memblock_set_bottom_up() as __init, but they could be referenced from non-init functions like memblock_find_in_range_node() on architectures that enable CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK.
For such builds kernel test robot reports:
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x74fea4): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_find_in_range_node() to the function .init.text:memblock_bottom_up() The function memblock_find_in_range_node() references the function __init memblock_bottom_up(). This is often because memblock_find_in_range_node lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of memblock_bottom_up is wrong.
Replace __init annotations with __init_memblock annotations so that the appropriate section will be selected depending on CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202103160133.UzhgY0wt-lkp@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316171347.14084-1-rppt@kernel.org Fixes: 34dc2efb39a2 ("memblock: fix section mismatch warning") Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport rppt@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand david@redhat.com Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index 7643d2dfa959..4ce9c8f9e684 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static inline void memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) /* * Set the allocation direction to bottom-up or top-down. */ -static inline __init void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable) +static inline __init_memblock void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable) { memblock.bottom_up = enable; } @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static inline __init void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable) * if this is true, that said, memblock will allocate memory * in bottom-up direction. */ -static inline __init bool memblock_bottom_up(void) +static inline __init_memblock bool memblock_bottom_up(void) { return memblock.bottom_up; }