From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 79168a669d8125453c8a271115f1ffd4294e61f6 ]
Currently, the dynptr function is not checking the variable offset part of PTR_TO_STACK that it needs to check. The fixed offset is considered when computing the stack pointer index, but if the variable offset was not a constant (such that it could not be accumulated in reg->off), we will end up a discrepency where runtime pointer does not point to the actual stack slot we mark as STACK_DYNPTR.
It is impossible to precisely track dynptr state when variable offset is not constant, hence, just like bpf_timer, kptr, bpf_spin_lock, etc. simply reject the case where reg->var_off is not constant. Then, consider both reg->off and reg->var_off.value when computing the stack pointer index.
A new helper dynptr_get_spi is introduced to hide over these details since the dynptr needs to be located in multiple places outside the process_dynptr_func checks, hence once we know it's a PTR_TO_STACK, we need to enforce these checks in all places.
Note that it is disallowed for unprivileged users to have a non-constant var_off, so this problem should only be possible to trigger from programs having CAP_PERFMON. However, its effects can vary.
Without the fix, it is possible to replace the contents of the dynptr arbitrarily by making verifier mark different stack slots than actual location and then doing writes to the actual stack address of dynptr at runtime.
Fixes: 97e03f521050 ("bpf: Add verifier support for dynptrs") Acked-by: Joanne Koong joannelkoong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230121002241.2113993-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 84 +++++++++++++++---- .../bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c | 4 +- 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index c42cb70150e96..749e7f7a720f2 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -638,11 +638,34 @@ static void print_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, verbose(env, "D"); }
-static int get_spi(s32 off) +static int __get_spi(s32 off) { return (-off - 1) / BPF_REG_SIZE; }
+static int dynptr_get_spi(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + int off, spi; + + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + verbose(env, "dynptr has to be at a constant offset\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + off = reg->off + reg->var_off.value; + if (off % BPF_REG_SIZE) { + verbose(env, "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=%d\n", off); + return -EINVAL; + } + + spi = __get_spi(off); + if (spi < 1) { + verbose(env, "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=%d\n", off); + return -EINVAL; + } + return spi; +} + static bool is_spi_bounds_valid(struct bpf_func_state *state, int spi, int nr_slots) { int allocated_slots = state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; @@ -754,7 +777,9 @@ static int mark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_ enum bpf_dynptr_type type; int spi, i, id;
- spi = get_spi(reg->off); + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi;
if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS)) return -EINVAL; @@ -792,7 +817,9 @@ static int unmark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_re struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); int spi, i;
- spi = get_spi(reg->off); + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi;
if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS)) return -EINVAL; @@ -844,7 +871,11 @@ static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) return false;
- spi = get_spi(reg->off); + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return false; + + /* We will do check_mem_access to check and update stack bounds later */ if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS)) return true;
@@ -860,14 +891,15 @@ static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_ static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); - int spi; - int i; + int spi, i;
/* This already represents first slot of initialized bpf_dynptr */ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) return true;
- spi = get_spi(reg->off); + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return false; if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS) || !state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.first_slot) return false; @@ -896,7 +928,9 @@ static bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) { return reg->dynptr.type == dynptr_type; } else { - spi = get_spi(reg->off); + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return false; return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type == dynptr_type; } } @@ -2425,7 +2459,9 @@ static int mark_dynptr_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state * */ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) return 0; - spi = get_spi(reg->off); + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi; /* Caller ensures dynptr is valid and initialized, which means spi is in * bounds and spi is the first dynptr slot. Simply mark stack slot as * read. @@ -6007,12 +6043,15 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, } /* CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR already has fixed and var_off as 0 due to * check_func_arg_reg_off's logic. We only need to check offset - * alignment for PTR_TO_STACK. + * and its alignment for PTR_TO_STACK. */ - if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK && (reg->off % BPF_REG_SIZE)) { - verbose(env, "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=%d\n", reg->off); - return -EINVAL; + if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { + int err = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + + if (err < 0) + return err; } + /* MEM_UNINIT - Points to memory that is an appropriate candidate for * constructing a mutable bpf_dynptr object. * @@ -6420,15 +6459,16 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } }
-static u32 dynptr_ref_obj_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +static int dynptr_ref_obj_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); int spi;
if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) return reg->ref_obj_id; - - spi = get_spi(reg->off); + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi; return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id; }
@@ -6502,7 +6542,9 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg, * PTR_TO_STACK. */ if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { - spi = get_spi(reg->off); + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi; if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS) || !state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id) { verbose(env, "arg %d is an unacquired reference\n", regno); @@ -7991,13 +8033,19 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS; i++) { if (arg_type_is_dynptr(fn->arg_type[i])) { struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[BPF_REG_1 + i]; + int ref_obj_id;
if (meta.ref_obj_id) { verbose(env, "verifier internal error: meta.ref_obj_id already set\n"); return -EFAULT; }
- meta.ref_obj_id = dynptr_ref_obj_id(env, reg); + ref_obj_id = dynptr_ref_obj_id(env, reg); + if (ref_obj_id < 0) { + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: failed to obtain dynptr ref_obj_id\n"); + return ref_obj_id; + } + meta.ref_obj_id = ref_obj_id; break; } } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c index a9229260a6cec..72800b1e8395a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static struct { const char *expected_verifier_err_msg; int expected_runtime_err; } kfunc_dynptr_tests[] = { - {"not_valid_dynptr", "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #1", 0}, + {"not_valid_dynptr", "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=-8", 0}, {"not_ptr_to_stack", "arg#0 expected pointer to stack or dynptr_ptr", 0}, {"dynptr_data_null", NULL, -EBADMSG}, }; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c index 78debc1b38207..02d57b95cf6ec 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int invalid_helper1(void *ctx)
/* A dynptr can't be passed into a helper function at a non-zero offset */ SEC("?raw_tp") -__failure __msg("Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #3") +__failure __msg("cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=-8") int invalid_helper2(void *ctx) { struct bpf_dynptr ptr; @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ int invalid_read4(void *ctx)
/* Initializing a dynptr on an offset should fail */ SEC("?raw_tp") -__failure __msg("invalid write to stack") +__failure __msg("cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=0") int invalid_offset(void *ctx) { struct bpf_dynptr ptr;