On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 12:15:26PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
commit 1de111b51b829bcf01d2e57971f8fd07a665fa3f upstream.
According to the SMCCC spec[1](7.5.2 Discovery) the ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 function id only returns 0, 1, and SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED.
0 is "workaround required and safe to call this function" 1 is "workaround not required but safe to call this function" SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is "might be vulnerable or might not be, who knows, I give up!"
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED might as well mean "workaround required, except calling this function may not work because it isn't implemented in some cases". Wonderful. We map this SMC call to
0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED 1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE
For KVM hypercalls (hvc), we've implemented this function id to return SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED, 0, and SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED. One of those isn't supposed to be there. Per the code we call arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() to figure out what to return for this feature discovery call.
0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE
Let's clean this up so that KVM tells the guest this mapping:
0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED 1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE
Note: SMCCC_RET_NOT_AFFECTED is 1 but isn't part of the SMCCC spec
Fixes: c118bbb52743 ("arm64: KVM: Propagate full Spectre v2 workaround state to KVM guests") Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd swboyd@chromium.org Acked-by: Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org Acked-by: Will Deacon will@kernel.org Cc: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com Cc: Steven Price steven.price@arm.com Cc: Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/latest [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023154751.1973872-1-swboyd@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd swboyd@chromium.org
arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 2 +- include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks for both of these, now queued up.
greg k-h