6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Bartosz Golaszewski bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org
[ Upstream commit 9f93f18305f5777820491e6ab9b34422c160371b ]
Variables managed with __free() should typically be initialized where they are declared so that the __free() callback is paired with its counterpart resource allocator. Fix the second instance of using __free() in gpio-sim to follow this pattern.
Fixes: 3faf89f27aab ("gpio: sim: simplify code with cleanup helpers") Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c index 44bf1709a6488..a8e5ac95cf170 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c @@ -1438,10 +1438,10 @@ static const struct config_item_type gpio_sim_device_config_group_type = { static struct config_group * gpio_sim_config_make_device_group(struct config_group *group, const char *name) { - struct gpio_sim_device *dev __free(kfree) = NULL; int id;
- dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); + struct gpio_sim_device *dev __free(kfree) = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), + GFP_KERNEL); if (!dev) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);