On 03. 11. 22, 2:24, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
If the intention is to overwrite the first NULL with a -1, s[strlen(s)] is the first NULL, not s[strlen(s)+1].
This caught my attention. You mix NULL (void *) with NUL (\0) in the changelog & subject. That occurs rather confusing to me.
Cc: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi krisman@collabora.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Jason@zx2c4.com
fs/unicode/mkutf8data.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/unicode/mkutf8data.c b/fs/unicode/mkutf8data.c index bc1a7c8b5c8d..61800e0d3226 100644 --- a/fs/unicode/mkutf8data.c +++ b/fs/unicode/mkutf8data.c @@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ static int normalize_line(struct tree *tree) /* Second test: length-limited string. */ s = buf2; /* Replace NUL with a value that will cause an error if seen. */
- s[strlen(s) + 1] = -1;
- s[strlen(s)] = -1; t = buf3; if (utf8cursor(&u8c, tree, s)) return -1;