5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit 1f566840a82982141f94086061927a90e79440e5 ]
The "Checking clocksource synchronization" message is normally printed when clocksource_verify_percpu() is called for a given clocksource if both the CLOCK_SOURCE_UNSTABLE and CLOCK_SOURCE_VERIFY_PERCPU flags are set.
It is an informational message and so pr_info() is the correct choice.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org Acked-by: John Stultz jstultz@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250125015442.3740588-1-longman@redhat.com Stable-dep-of: 6bb05a33337b ("clocksource: Use migrate_disable() to avoid calling get_random_u32() in atomic context") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c index 658b90755dd72..21dfee6c0d936 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c @@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ static void clocksource_verify_percpu(struct clocksource *cs) return; } testcpu = smp_processor_id(); - pr_warn("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); + pr_info("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", + cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_chosen) { if (cpu == testcpu) continue;