6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Maciej Wieczor-Retman maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 4d7f4e8158b62f63031510cdc24acc520956c091 ]
Compiling pidfd selftest after adding a __printf() attribute to ksft_print_msg() and ksft_test_result_pass() exposes -Wformat warnings in error_report(), test_pidfd_poll_exec_thread(), child_poll_exec_test(), test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread(), child_poll_leader_exit_test().
The ksft_test_result_pass() in error_report() expects a string but doesn't provide any argument after the format string. All the other calls to ksft_print_msg() in the functions mentioned above have format strings that don't match with other passed arguments.
Fix format specifiers so they match the passed variables.
Add a missing variable to ksft_test_result_pass() inside error_report() so it matches other cases in the switch statement.
Fixes: 2def297ec7fb ("pidfd: add tests for NSpid info in fdinfo")
Signed-off-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c index 4e86f927880c3..01cc37bf611c3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static void error_report(struct error *err, const char *test_name) break;
case PIDFD_PASS: - ksft_test_result_pass("%s test: Passed\n"); + ksft_test_result_pass("%s test: Passed\n", test_name); break;
default: diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c index 00a07e7c571cd..c081ae91313aa 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c @@ -381,13 +381,13 @@ static int test_pidfd_send_signal_syscall_support(void)
static void *test_pidfd_poll_exec_thread(void *priv) { - ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %d ; and sleeping\n", + ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %ld ; and sleeping\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: doing exec of sleep\n");
execl("/bin/sleep", "sleep", str(CHILD_THREAD_MIN_WAIT), (char *)NULL);
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %d\n", + ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); return NULL; } @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static int child_poll_exec_test(void *args) { pthread_t t1;
- ksft_print_msg("Child (pidfd): starting. pid %d tid %d\n", getpid(), + ksft_print_msg("Child (pidfd): starting. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); pthread_create(&t1, NULL, test_pidfd_poll_exec_thread, NULL); /* @@ -480,10 +480,10 @@ static void test_pidfd_poll_exec(int use_waitpid)
static void *test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread(void *priv) { - ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %d ; and sleeping\n", + ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %ld ; and sleeping\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); sleep(CHILD_THREAD_MIN_WAIT); - ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %d\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); + ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); return NULL; }
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static int child_poll_leader_exit_test(void *args) { pthread_t t1, t2;
- ksft_print_msg("Child: starting. pid %d tid %d\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); + ksft_print_msg("Child: starting. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); pthread_create(&t1, NULL, test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread, NULL); pthread_create(&t2, NULL, test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread, NULL);