On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 18:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.16 release. There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.16-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.11.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.11.16-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.11.y * git commit: f34f787f0e47983f4f18c818b2cf23f5e3bf576e * git describe: v5.11.15-123-gf34f787f0e47 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11....
## No regressions (compared to v5.11.14-24-g7825299a896f)
## No fixes (compared to v5.11.14-24-g7825299a896f)
## Test result summary total: 76776, pass: 63385, fail: 2827, skip: 10320, xfail: 244,
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed * i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed * x86: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest- * kselftest-android * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-lkdtm * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native- * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none- * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org