The patch below does not apply to the 5.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From bd82d4bd21880b7c4d5f5756be435095d6ae07b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julien Thierry julien.thierry@arm.com Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:38:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking
When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore() potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1].
In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR.
GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path) requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the CPU when using only PSR.I.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html
Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1.x- Reported-by: Zenghui Yu yuzenghui@huawei.com Cc: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Wei Li liwei391@huawei.com Cc: Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com Cc: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@arm.com Cc: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze suzuki.poulose@arm.com Cc: Oleg Nesterov oleg@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry julien.thierry@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h index 14b41ddc68ba..9e991b628706 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h @@ -163,7 +163,9 @@ static inline bool gic_prio_masking_enabled(void)
static inline void gic_pmr_mask_irqs(void) { - BUILD_BUG_ON(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI <= GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF); + BUILD_BUG_ON(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI < (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF | + GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET)); + BUILD_BUG_ON(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI >= GIC_PRIO_IRQON); gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF); }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h index db452aa9e651..f93204f319da 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
+#include <asm/arch_gicv3.h> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#define DAIF_PROCCTX 0 @@ -32,6 +33,11 @@ static inline void local_daif_mask(void) : : : "memory"); + + /* Don't really care for a dsb here, we don't intend to enable IRQs */ + if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) + gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET); + trace_hardirqs_off(); }
@@ -43,7 +49,7 @@ static inline unsigned long local_daif_save(void)
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) { /* If IRQs are masked with PMR, reflect it in the flags */ - if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) <= GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF) + if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) != GIC_PRIO_IRQON) flags |= PSR_I_BIT; }
@@ -59,36 +65,44 @@ static inline void local_daif_restore(unsigned long flags) if (!irq_disabled) { trace_hardirqs_on();
- if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) - arch_local_irq_enable(); - } else if (!(flags & PSR_A_BIT)) { - /* - * If interrupts are disabled but we can take - * asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs - */ if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) { - flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT; + gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON); + dsb(sy); + } + } else if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) { + u64 pmr; + + if (!(flags & PSR_A_BIT)) { /* - * There has been concern that the write to daif - * might be reordered before this write to PMR. - * From the ARM ARM DDI 0487D.a, section D1.7.1 - * "Accessing PSTATE fields": - * Writes to the PSTATE fields have side-effects on - * various aspects of the PE operation. All of these - * side-effects are guaranteed: - * - Not to be visible to earlier instructions in - * the execution stream. - * - To be visible to later instructions in the - * execution stream - * - * Also, writes to PMR are self-synchronizing, so no - * interrupts with a lower priority than PMR is signaled - * to the PE after the write. - * - * So we don't need additional synchronization here. + * If interrupts are disabled but we can take + * asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs */ - arch_local_irq_disable(); + flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT; + pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF; + } else { + pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET; } + + /* + * There has been concern that the write to daif + * might be reordered before this write to PMR. + * From the ARM ARM DDI 0487D.a, section D1.7.1 + * "Accessing PSTATE fields": + * Writes to the PSTATE fields have side-effects on + * various aspects of the PE operation. All of these + * side-effects are guaranteed: + * - Not to be visible to earlier instructions in + * the execution stream. + * - To be visible to later instructions in the + * execution stream + * + * Also, writes to PMR are self-synchronizing, so no + * interrupts with a lower priority than PMR is signaled + * to the PE after the write. + * + * So we don't need additional synchronization here. + */ + gic_write_pmr(pmr); }
write_sysreg(flags, daif); diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h index fbe1aba6ffb3..a1372722f12e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h @@ -67,43 +67,46 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void) */ static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void) { - unsigned long daif_bits; unsigned long flags;
- daif_bits = read_sysreg(daif); - - /* - * The asm is logically equivalent to: - * - * if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) - * flags = (daif_bits & PSR_I_BIT) ? - * GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF : - * read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1); - * else - * flags = daif_bits; - */ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( - "mov %0, %1\n" - "nop\n" - "nop", - __mrs_s("%0", SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) - "ands %1, %1, " __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n" - "csel %0, %0, %2, eq", - ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) - : "=&r" (flags), "+r" (daif_bits) - : "r" ((unsigned long) GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF) - : "cc", "memory"); + "mrs %0, daif", + __mrs_s("%0", SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1), + ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) + : "=&r" (flags) + : + : "memory");
return flags; }
+static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags) +{ + int res; + + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( + "and %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(PSR_I_BIT), + "eor %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(GIC_PRIO_IRQON), + ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) + : "=&r" (res) + : "r" ((int) flags) + : "memory"); + + return res; +} + static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void) { unsigned long flags;
flags = arch_local_save_flags();
- arch_local_irq_disable(); + /* + * There are too many states with IRQs disabled, just keep the current + * state if interrupts are already disabled/masked. + */ + if (!arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) + arch_local_irq_disable();
return flags; } @@ -124,21 +127,5 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags) : "memory"); }
-static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags) -{ - int res; - - asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( - "and %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n" - "nop", - "cmp %w1, #" __stringify(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF) "\n" - "cset %w0, ls", - ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) - : "=&r" (res) - : "r" ((int) flags) - : "cc", "memory"); - - return res; -} #endif #endif diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 4bcd9c1291d5..33410635b015 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -608,11 +608,12 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_enter(void) * will not signal the CPU of interrupts of lower priority, and the * only way to get out will be via guest exceptions. * Naturally, we want to avoid this. + * + * local_daif_mask() already sets GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET, we just need a + * dsb to ensure the redistributor is forwards EL2 IRQs to the CPU. */ - if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) { - gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON); + if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) dsb(sy); - } }
static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit(void) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h index b2de32939ada..da2242248466 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h @@ -35,9 +35,15 @@ * means masking more IRQs (or at least that the same IRQs remain masked). * * To mask interrupts, we clear the most significant bit of PMR. + * + * Some code sections either automatically switch back to PSR.I or explicitly + * require to not use priority masking. If bit GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is included + * in the the priority mask, it indicates that PSR.I should be set and + * interrupt disabling temporarily does not rely on IRQ priorities. */ -#define GIC_PRIO_IRQON 0xf0 -#define GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF (GIC_PRIO_IRQON & ~0x80) +#define GIC_PRIO_IRQON 0xc0 +#define GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF (GIC_PRIO_IRQON & ~0x80) +#define GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET (1 << 4)
/* Additional SPSR bits not exposed in the UABI */ #define PSR_IL_BIT (1 << 20) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S index 6d5966346710..165da78815c5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif /* * Registers that may be useful after this macro is invoked: * + * x20 - ICC_PMR_EL1 * x21 - aborted SP * x22 - aborted PC * x23 - aborted PSTATE @@ -449,6 +450,24 @@ alternative_endif .endm #endif
+ .macro gic_prio_kentry_setup, tmp:req +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI + alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING + mov \tmp, #(GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET | GIC_PRIO_IRQON) + msr_s SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, \tmp + alternative_else_nop_endif +#endif + .endm + + .macro gic_prio_irq_setup, pmr:req, tmp:req +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI + alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING + orr \tmp, \pmr, #GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET + msr_s SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, \tmp + alternative_else_nop_endif +#endif + .endm + .text
/* @@ -627,6 +646,7 @@ el1_dbg: cmp x24, #ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64 // if BRK64 cinc x24, x24, eq // set bit '0' tbz x24, #0, el1_inv // EL1 only + gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3 mrs x0, far_el1 mov x2, sp // struct pt_regs bl do_debug_exception @@ -644,12 +664,10 @@ ENDPROC(el1_sync) .align 6 el1_irq: kernel_entry 1 + gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x1 enable_da_f
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI -alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING - ldr x20, [sp, #S_PMR_SAVE] -alternative_else_nop_endif test_irqs_unmasked res=x0, pmr=x20 cbz x0, 1f bl asm_nmi_enter @@ -679,8 +697,9 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI /* - * if IRQs were disabled when we received the interrupt, we have an NMI - * and we are not re-enabling interrupt upon eret. Skip tracing. + * When using IRQ priority masking, we can get spurious interrupts while + * PMR is set to GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF. An NMI might also have occurred in a + * section with interrupts disabled. Skip tracing in those cases. */ test_irqs_unmasked res=x0, pmr=x20 cbz x0, 1f @@ -809,6 +828,7 @@ el0_ia: * Instruction abort handling */ mrs x26, far_el1 + gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x0 enable_da_f #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS bl trace_hardirqs_off @@ -854,6 +874,7 @@ el0_sp_pc: * Stack or PC alignment exception handling */ mrs x26, far_el1 + gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x0 enable_da_f #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS bl trace_hardirqs_off @@ -888,6 +909,7 @@ el0_dbg: * Debug exception handling */ tbnz x24, #0, el0_inv // EL0 only + gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3 mrs x0, far_el1 mov x1, x25 mov x2, sp @@ -909,7 +931,9 @@ ENDPROC(el0_sync) el0_irq: kernel_entry 0 el0_irq_naked: + gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x0 enable_da_f + #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS bl trace_hardirqs_off #endif @@ -931,6 +955,7 @@ ENDPROC(el0_irq) el1_error: kernel_entry 1 mrs x1, esr_el1 + gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x2 enable_dbg mov x0, sp bl do_serror @@ -941,6 +966,7 @@ el0_error: kernel_entry 0 el0_error_naked: mrs x1, esr_el1 + gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x2 enable_dbg mov x0, sp bl do_serror @@ -965,6 +991,7 @@ work_pending: */ ret_to_user: disable_daif + gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3 ldr x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] and x2, x1, #_TIF_WORK_MASK cbnz x2, work_pending @@ -981,6 +1008,7 @@ ENDPROC(ret_to_user) */ .align 6 el0_svc: + gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x1 mov x0, sp bl el0_svc_handler b ret_to_user diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c index 3767fb21a5b8..58efc3727778 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void __cpu_do_idle_irqprio(void) * be raised. */ pmr = gic_read_pmr(); - gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON); + gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
__cpu_do_idle();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c index bb4b3f07761a..4deaee3c2a33 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c @@ -192,11 +192,13 @@ static void init_gic_priority_masking(void)
WARN_ON(!(cpuflags & PSR_I_BIT));
- gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF); - /* We can only unmask PSR.I if we can take aborts */ - if (!(cpuflags & PSR_A_BIT)) + if (!(cpuflags & PSR_A_BIT)) { + gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF); write_sysreg(cpuflags & ~PSR_I_BIT, daif); + } else { + gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET); + } }
/* diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c index 8799e0c267d4..b89fcf0173b7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * Naturally, we want to avoid this. */ if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) { - gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON); + gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET); dsb(sy); }