From: Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com
commit 9537bae0da1f8d1e2361ab6d0479e8af7824e160 upstream.
wake_up_poll() uses nr_exclusive=1, so it's not guaranteed to wake up all exclusive waiters. Yet, POLLFREE *must* wake up all waiters. epoll and aio poll are fortunately not affected by this, but it's very fragile. Thus, the new function wake_up_pollfree() has been introduced.
Convert signalfd to use wake_up_pollfree().
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Fixes: d80e731ecab4 ("epoll: introduce POLLFREE to flush ->signalfd_wqh before kfree()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211209010455.42744-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/signalfd.c | 12 +----------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/signalfd.c +++ b/fs/signalfd.c @@ -34,17 +34,7 @@
void signalfd_cleanup(struct sighand_struct *sighand) { - wait_queue_head_t *wqh = &sighand->signalfd_wqh; - /* - * The lockless check can race with remove_wait_queue() in progress, - * but in this case its caller should run under rcu_read_lock() and - * sighand_cachep is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, we can safely return. - */ - if (likely(!waitqueue_active(wqh))) - return; - - /* wait_queue_t->func(POLLFREE) should do remove_wait_queue() */ - wake_up_poll(wqh, POLLHUP | POLLFREE); + wake_up_pollfree(&sighand->signalfd_wqh); }
struct signalfd_ctx {