On Fri, Dec 12, 2025, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 10:59 +0000, Khushit Shah wrote: And my intent was that the in-kernel I/O APIC patch gets included as *part* of this series, otherwise we're making a semantic change to the ENABLE behaviour later.
Hmm, my only concern on that front is that we'd be backporting effectively new functionality to stable@ kernels that isn't strictly necessary. But that's probably fine given that it requires userspace to opt-in.
Also... how does userspace discover the availability of these flags?
Ugh, yeah, I was reading too fast and overlooked that. This needs a CAP.