6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ramesh Errabolu Ramesh.Errabolu@amd.com
[ Upstream commit d2d3a44008fea01ec7d5a9d9ca527286be2e0257 ]
Analysis of code by Coverity, a static code analyser, has identified a resource leak in the symbol hmm_range. This leak occurs when one of the prior steps before it is released encounters an error.
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Errabolu Ramesh.Errabolu@amd.com Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling felix.kuehling@amd.com Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c index 31e500859ab01..92485251247a0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c @@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ static int svm_range_validate_and_map(struct mm_struct *mm, start = map_start << PAGE_SHIFT; end = (map_last + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT; for (addr = start; !r && addr < end; ) { - struct hmm_range *hmm_range; + struct hmm_range *hmm_range = NULL; unsigned long map_start_vma; unsigned long map_last_vma; struct vm_area_struct *vma; @@ -1696,7 +1696,12 @@ static int svm_range_validate_and_map(struct mm_struct *mm, }
svm_range_lock(prange); - if (!r && amdgpu_hmm_range_get_pages_done(hmm_range)) { + + /* Free backing memory of hmm_range if it was initialized + * Overrride return value to TRY AGAIN only if prior returns + * were successful + */ + if (hmm_range && amdgpu_hmm_range_get_pages_done(hmm_range) && !r) { pr_debug("hmm update the range, need validate again\n"); r = -EAGAIN; }