5.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Darrick J. Wong darrick.wong@oracle.com
commit e6a9467ea14bae8691b0f72c500510c42ea8edb8 upstream.
ocfs2_reflink_inodes_lock() can swap the inode1/inode2 variables so that we always grab cluster locks in order of increasing inode number.
Unfortunately, we forget to swap the inode record buffer head pointers when we've done this, which leads to incorrect bookkeepping when we're trying to make the two inodes have the same refcount tree.
This has the effect of causing filesystem shutdowns if you're trying to reflink data from inode 100 into inode 97, where inode 100 already has a refcount tree attached and inode 97 doesn't. The reflink code decides to copy the refcount tree pointer from 100 to 97, but uses inode 97's inode record to open the tree root (which it doesn't have) and blows up. This issue causes filesystem shutdowns and metadata corruption!
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190312214910.GK20533@magnolia Fixes: 29ac8e856cb369 ("ocfs2: implement the VFS clone_range, copy_range, and dedupe_range features") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong darrick.wong@oracle.com Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi jiangqi903@gmail.com Cc: Mark Fasheh mfasheh@versity.com Cc: Joel Becker jlbec@evilplan.org Cc: Junxiao Bi junxiao.bi@oracle.com Cc: Joseph Qi joseph.qi@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c @@ -4719,22 +4719,23 @@ out:
/* Lock an inode and grab a bh pointing to the inode. */ int ocfs2_reflink_inodes_lock(struct inode *s_inode, - struct buffer_head **bh1, + struct buffer_head **bh_s, struct inode *t_inode, - struct buffer_head **bh2) + struct buffer_head **bh_t) { - struct inode *inode1; - struct inode *inode2; + struct inode *inode1 = s_inode; + struct inode *inode2 = t_inode; struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi1; struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi2; + struct buffer_head *bh1 = NULL; + struct buffer_head *bh2 = NULL; bool same_inode = (s_inode == t_inode); + bool need_swap = (inode1->i_ino > inode2->i_ino); int status;
/* First grab the VFS and rw locks. */ lock_two_nondirectories(s_inode, t_inode); - inode1 = s_inode; - inode2 = t_inode; - if (inode1->i_ino > inode2->i_ino) + if (need_swap) swap(inode1, inode2);
status = ocfs2_rw_lock(inode1, 1); @@ -4757,17 +4758,13 @@ int ocfs2_reflink_inodes_lock(struct ino trace_ocfs2_double_lock((unsigned long long)oi1->ip_blkno, (unsigned long long)oi2->ip_blkno);
- if (*bh1) - *bh1 = NULL; - if (*bh2) - *bh2 = NULL; - /* We always want to lock the one with the lower lockid first. */ if (oi1->ip_blkno > oi2->ip_blkno) mlog_errno(-ENOLCK);
/* lock id1 */ - status = ocfs2_inode_lock_nested(inode1, bh1, 1, OI_LS_REFLINK_TARGET); + status = ocfs2_inode_lock_nested(inode1, &bh1, 1, + OI_LS_REFLINK_TARGET); if (status < 0) { if (status != -ENOENT) mlog_errno(status); @@ -4776,15 +4773,25 @@ int ocfs2_reflink_inodes_lock(struct ino
/* lock id2 */ if (!same_inode) { - status = ocfs2_inode_lock_nested(inode2, bh2, 1, + status = ocfs2_inode_lock_nested(inode2, &bh2, 1, OI_LS_REFLINK_TARGET); if (status < 0) { if (status != -ENOENT) mlog_errno(status); goto out_cl1; } - } else - *bh2 = *bh1; + } else { + bh2 = bh1; + } + + /* + * If we swapped inode order above, we have to swap the buffer heads + * before passing them back to the caller. + */ + if (need_swap) + swap(bh1, bh2); + *bh_s = bh1; + *bh_t = bh2;
trace_ocfs2_double_lock_end( (unsigned long long)oi1->ip_blkno, @@ -4794,8 +4801,7 @@ int ocfs2_reflink_inodes_lock(struct ino
out_cl1: ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode1, 1); - brelse(*bh1); - *bh1 = NULL; + brelse(bh1); out_rw2: ocfs2_rw_unlock(inode2, 1); out_i2: