5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jack Wang jinpu.wang@ionos.com
commit 3d7d72a34e05b23e21bafc8bfb861e73c86b31f3 upstream.
On large enclaves we hit the softlockup warning with following call trace:
xa_erase() sgx_vepc_release() __fput() task_work_run() do_exit()
The latency issue is similar to the one fixed in:
8795359e35bc ("x86/sgx: Silence softlockup detection when releasing large enclaves")
The test system has 64GB of enclave memory, and all is assigned to a single VM. Release of 'vepc' takes a longer time and causes long latencies, which triggers the softlockup warning.
Add cond_resched() to give other tasks a chance to run and reduce latencies, which also avoids the softlockup detector.
[ mingo: Rewrote the changelog. ]
Fixes: 540745ddbc70 ("x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests") Reported-by: Yu Zhang yu.zhang@ionos.com Signed-off-by: Jack Wang jinpu.wang@ionos.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Tested-by: Yu Zhang yu.zhang@ionos.com Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Kai Huang kai.huang@intel.com Acked-by: Haitao Huang haitao.huang@linux.intel.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ static int sgx_vepc_release(struct inode continue;
xa_erase(&vepc->page_array, index); + cond_resched(); }
/* @@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ static int sgx_vepc_release(struct inode list_add_tail(&epc_page->list, &secs_pages);
xa_erase(&vepc->page_array, index); + cond_resched(); }
/* @@ -206,6 +208,7 @@ static int sgx_vepc_release(struct inode
if (sgx_vepc_free_page(epc_page)) list_add_tail(&epc_page->list, &secs_pages); + cond_resched(); }
if (!list_empty(&secs_pages))