Re: [PATCH 1/2] exec: Properly mark the point of no return

Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de writes:

On 3/5/20 10:15 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

...

@@ -1266,7 +1267,7 @@ int flush_old_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) * Make sure we have a private signal table and that * we are unassociated from the previous thread group. */

• retval = de_thread(current);

• retval = de_thread(bprm, current);

can we get rid of passing current as parameter here?

With a separate patch. It makes the patch less clear if I make that change in this one.

Eric