4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org
commit de9e478b9d49f3a0214310d921450cf5bb4a21e6 upstream.
In commit 11f1a4b9755f ("x86: reorganize SMAP handling in user space accesses") I changed how the stac/clac instructions were generated around the user space accesses, which then made it possible to do batched accesses efficiently for user string copies etc.
However, in doing so, I completely spaced out, and didn't even think about the 32-bit case. And nobody really even seemed to notice, because SMAP doesn't even exist until modern Skylake processors, and you'd have to be crazy to run 32-bit kernels on a modern CPU.
Which brings us to Andy Lutomirski.
He actually tested the 32-bit kernel on new hardware, and noticed that it doesn't work. My bad. The trivial fix is to add the required uaccess begin/end markers around the raw accesses in <asm/uaccess_32.h>.
I feel a bit bad about this patch, just because that header file really should be cleaned up to avoid all the duplicated code in it, and this commit just expands on the problem. But this just fixes the bug without any bigger cleanup surgery.
Reported-and-tested-by: Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h @@ -48,20 +48,28 @@ __copy_to_user_inatomic(void __user *to,
switch (n) { case 1: + __uaccess_begin(); __put_user_size(*(u8 *)from, (u8 __user *)to, 1, ret, 1); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 2: + __uaccess_begin(); __put_user_size(*(u16 *)from, (u16 __user *)to, 2, ret, 2); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 4: + __uaccess_begin(); __put_user_size(*(u32 *)from, (u32 __user *)to, 4, ret, 4); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 8: + __uaccess_begin(); __put_user_size(*(u64 *)from, (u64 __user *)to, 8, ret, 8); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; } } @@ -103,13 +111,19 @@ __copy_from_user_inatomic(void *to, cons
switch (n) { case 1: + __uaccess_begin(); __get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 2: + __uaccess_begin(); __get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 4: + __uaccess_begin(); __get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; } } @@ -148,13 +162,19 @@ __copy_from_user(void *to, const void __
switch (n) { case 1: + __uaccess_begin(); __get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 2: + __uaccess_begin(); __get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 4: + __uaccess_begin(); __get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; } } @@ -170,13 +190,19 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __c
switch (n) { case 1: + __uaccess_begin(); __get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 2: + __uaccess_begin(); __get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; case 4: + __uaccess_begin(); __get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4); + __uaccess_end(); return ret; } }