5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Heiko Carstens hca@linux.ibm.com
[ Upstream commit 223e7fb979fa06934f1595b6ad0ae1d4ead1147f ]
Also initialize regs->psw.mask in perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs(). This way user_mode(regs) will return false, like it should.
It looks like all current users initialize regs to zero, so that this doesn't fix a bug currently. However it is better to not rely on callers to do this.
Fixes: 914d52e46490 ("s390: implement perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs") Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens hca@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h index b9da71632827f..ea340b9018398 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/perf_event.h @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct perf_sf_sde_regs { #define SAMPLE_FREQ_MODE(hwc) (SAMPL_FLAGS(hwc) & PERF_CPUM_SF_FREQ_MODE)
#define perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs(regs, __ip) do { \ + (regs)->psw.mask = 0; \ (regs)->psw.addr = (__ip); \ (regs)->gprs[15] = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0) - \ offsetof(struct stack_frame, back_chain); \