On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:08 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 25/05/2020 08:41, Weiyi Lu wrote:
It'd be dangerous when struct clk_core have new memebers. Add the missing initial value to clk_init_data.
Sorry I don't really understand this commit message, can please explain. In any case if this is a problem, then we probably we should fix it for all drivers. Apart from drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-cpumux.c
Actually, we were looking into an android kernel patch "ANDROID: GKI: clk: Add support for voltage voting" [1]
In this patch, there adds a new member struct clk_vdd_class *vdd_class; in struct clk_init_data and struct clk_core
And then in clk_register(...) core->vdd_class = hw->init->vdd_class;
In many clock APIs, it will check the core->vdd_class to select the correct control flow. So, if we don't assign an initial value to clk_init_data of mtk_mux clock type, something might go wrong. And assigning an initial value might be the easiest and good way to avoid such problem if any new clock support added in the future.
[1] https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/1278046
It's a widely used pattern: $ git grep "struct clk_init_data init;"| wc -l 235
Regards, Matthias
Fixes: a3ae549917f1 ("clk: mediatek: Add new clkmux register API") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu weiyi.lu@mediatek.com
drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c index 76f9cd0..14e127e 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ struct clk *mtk_clk_register_mux(const struct mtk_mux *mux, spinlock_t *lock) { struct mtk_clk_mux *clk_mux;
- struct clk_init_data init;
- struct clk_init_data init = {}; struct clk *clk;
clk_mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*clk_mux), GFP_KERNEL);