4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Roman Pen roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com
commit a347c7ad8edf4c5685154f3fdc3c12fc1db800ba upstream.
It is not allowed to reinit q->tag_set_list list entry while RCU grace period has not completed yet, otherwise the following soft lockup in blk_mq_sched_restart() happens:
[ 1064.252652] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#12 stuck for 23s! [fio:9270] [ 1064.254445] task: ffff99b912e8b900 task.stack: ffffa6d54c758000 [ 1064.254613] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_sched_restart+0x96/0x150 [ 1064.256510] Call Trace: [ 1064.256664] <IRQ> [ 1064.256824] blk_mq_free_request+0xea/0x100 [ 1064.256987] msg_io_conf+0x59/0xd0 [ibnbd_client] [ 1064.257175] complete_rdma_req+0xf2/0x230 [ibtrs_client] [ 1064.257340] ? ibtrs_post_recv_empty+0x4d/0x70 [ibtrs_core] [ 1064.257502] ibtrs_clt_rdma_done+0xd1/0x1e0 [ibtrs_client] [ 1064.257669] ib_create_qp+0x321/0x380 [ib_core] [ 1064.257841] ib_process_cq_direct+0xbd/0x120 [ib_core] [ 1064.258007] irq_poll_softirq+0xb7/0xe0 [ 1064.258165] __do_softirq+0x106/0x2a2 [ 1064.258328] irq_exit+0x92/0xa0 [ 1064.258509] do_IRQ+0x4a/0xd0 [ 1064.258660] common_interrupt+0x7a/0x7a [ 1064.258818] </IRQ>
Meanwhile another context frees other queue but with the same set of shared tags:
[ 1288.201183] INFO: task bash:5910 blocked for more than 180 seconds. [ 1288.201833] bash D 0 5910 5820 0x00000000 [ 1288.202016] Call Trace: [ 1288.202315] schedule+0x32/0x80 [ 1288.202462] schedule_timeout+0x1e5/0x380 [ 1288.203838] wait_for_completion+0xb0/0x120 [ 1288.204137] __wait_rcu_gp+0x125/0x160 [ 1288.204287] synchronize_sched+0x6e/0x80 [ 1288.204770] blk_mq_free_queue+0x74/0xe0 [ 1288.204922] blk_cleanup_queue+0xc7/0x110 [ 1288.205073] ibnbd_clt_unmap_device+0x1bc/0x280 [ibnbd_client] [ 1288.205389] ibnbd_clt_unmap_dev_store+0x169/0x1f0 [ibnbd_client] [ 1288.205548] kernfs_fop_write+0x109/0x180 [ 1288.206328] vfs_write+0xb3/0x1a0 [ 1288.206476] SyS_write+0x52/0xc0 [ 1288.206624] do_syscall_64+0x68/0x1d0 [ 1288.206774] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
What happened is the following:
1. There are several MQ queues with shared tags. 2. One queue is about to be freed and now task is in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(). 3. Other CPU is in blk_mq_sched_restart() and loops over all queues in tag list in order to find hctx to restart.
Because linked list entry was modified in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() without proper waiting for a grace period, blk_mq_sched_restart() never ends, spining in list_for_each_entry_rcu_rr(), thus soft lockup.
Fix is simple: reinit list entry after an RCU grace period elapsed.
Fixes: Fixes: 705cda97ee3a ("blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sagi Grimberg sagi@grimberg.me Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Reviewed-by: Ming Lei ming.lei@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche bart.vanassche@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Roman Pen roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- block/blk-mq.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2473,7 +2473,6 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(str
mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock); list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list); if (list_is_singular(&set->tag_list)) { /* just transitioned to unshared */ set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED; @@ -2481,8 +2480,8 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(str blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, false); } mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock); - synchronize_rcu(); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list); }
static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,